Showing posts with label Guest post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest post. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 31

Blodeuedd Discusses the Heartstrikers series by Rachel Aaron

 


They are my comfort books. And they are so fun listening too.  Rachel Aaron is an amazing author, and Vikas Adam is a fantastic narrator. He truly makes these books. They are a MUST listen.

I will say it with pictures. I did my best to find fan art. But there is not much out there


Julius Heartstriker by Caffinated-Pinecone on DeviantArt


I Love Julius! The best nice dragon ever



Bob the Seer by Sammybunny711.

The mastermind behind it all.

I have re-listened to book 1 2 and 3. Good times. I am on book 4 but I had to take a break and get some other books in

Tuesday, September 19

Tell Me Something Tuesday: Teen Romance


Tell Me Something Tuesday is a weekly discussion post on Rainy Day Ramblings where Rainy discuss a wide range of topics from books to blogging. Weigh in and join the conversation by adding your thoughts in the comments. If you want to do your own post, grab the question and answer it on your blog.

Yayy! Blodeuedd asked me to jump in and write a quick post for this week's TMST! I've been thinking about joining in. Maybe after this week I shall. :D We shall see. 



Favorite teen romances? Hmmm that is a tough one for sure……
I am about to hear the groans and moans on this one, but it isn’t what it will seem. I promise. But I love the teen romances in the Twilight books. NOT Edward and Bella or Bella and Jacob. I love the side character romances like Rosalie and Emmett or Alice and Casper. I love all the pack members when they find the ones they imprint on. I loved hearing about those romances and love stories. Edward and Bella has nothing on them at all. 

The teen romance that I really love is the love story between the characters in Reincarnation by Suzanne Weyn. SO tragic, SO sad. These two spirits keep finding each other in all these lifetimes, but something always pulls them apart. Some may call this one cheating, because in some of their lifetimes they are not teens, but I totally count this one! This is so good and it takes centuries for them to have their HEA. SO GOOD!!! I need to re-read this. 

Thank you, Blodeuedd, for letting me share my thoughts this week!! 










Since Blodeuedd always shares pictures of her kitty. ;) Here is Miss Mamyia not allowing me to read. 


Sunday, March 12

Guest Author Post: From Screenwriter to Novelist by Fred Holmes

Happy late Sunday everyone! We have a special post today by Fred Holmes author of The Ugly Teapot.  Enjoy! And thank you so much Fred Holmes for taking time to share your incredible story with us. 



Let me start off by telling you about my novel: THE UGLY TEAPOT is the story of a fourteen-year-old girl who loved her father so much that she worried about him constantly. After all, he was a photographer who traveled to the most dangerous places in the world.

To allay her fears, each time he came home he brought her silly gifts, each one with supposed magical powers: the Seal of Solomon, the Ring of Gyges, even Aladdin’s Lamp. It was that lamp that the girl found most unbelievable, for it looked like an ugly teapot. Nevertheless, her father assured her it was real, and made her promise to save her three wishes for something very special.

Then . . . six months later . . . the unthinkable happened. Her father was killed while on assignment to Baghdad. And so on the day of his funeral the girl did something she never thought she would ever do. She took out that teapot and gave it a rub . . .

Okay, that’s the story blurb, and now I have a confession to make. I didn’t start out to write novels. I started out to make films. I directed two feature films starring Lou Diamond Phillips, one for Miramax and one for Lionsgate; then I directed a Bollywood feature film shot on location in India that starred two huge Bollywood stars, one of whom had won the Indian version of an Academy Award.

I also wrote and directed a lot—and I do mean a LOT! —of television. Some of these were documentaries shot all over the world, but mostly I worked in series television—and most of these shows were in the area of children’s television. According to IMDB, I’ve directed north of 250 episodes of TV, and along the way I’ve won quite a few awards, including two Emmys.

Why am I telling you all of this? Because none of it matters. Seriously, when I started writing novels I discovered that all of my work in television and film was irrelevant. It didn’t matter one bit. Okay, maybe it did matter one bit—writing so much television had taught me what a good story looked like, sounded like, tasted like (they taste like chicken and go really well with some fava beans and a nice Chianti), but I still had to learn how to translate that knowledge into writing prose. And there is a difference between writing prose and writing screenplays. Oh yeah, trust me on this. There’s a huge difference.

In order to educate myself on how to write novels, I began by reading a lot of books on the process, and I spoke with my friends who were novelists. I also read a lot of children’s fiction. I’ve always loved reading, and I’ve always loved children’s literature; plus I’ve been fortunate to work on television shows that starred children. All of this helped. It also helped that screenplays and novels do share a common rule: “Show not tell”. Unfortunately, they’re also completely different in that novels are meant to be read and screenplays are meant to be filmed. Yeah, I know, duh...but what this means is that you only write down in a screenplay what the audience will see and/or hear. You do not dig deep into the characters’ psyche—that’s for the actors to portray, and the director to cover visually—and they both get really upset with you if you mess with their territory!

So in order to write THE UGLY TEAPOT, I had to learn how to write fiction. This was a challenge for someone who had never taken a writing course. What I did have, fortunately, was a lot of experience telling stories. I also had a good story to tell. THE UGLY TEAPOT began life as a screenplay called FIREFLIES, and everyone who had read it, loved it. It had been optioned numerous times by some powerful producers (including Gerald R. Molen who had won the Academy Award for producing Schindler’s List). Jerry tried to get FIREFLIES made into a movie for a number of years, but he was known for producing big-budgeted films (HOOK, JURASSIC PARK, MINORITY REPORT, etc.), and FIREFLIES was a sweet, small-budgeted film, so he was never able to get it made. Then a friend of mine at Disney read it, loved it, and told me, “This is really good. You should adapt it into a novel.”

This struck a chord with me. First, I really appreciated the praise; and second, I’d always wanted to write novels, I just never thought I could. Why? Well, the best analogy I can give you comes from some of my actor friends in Hollywood. A lot of them will tell you, “I’m only acting in television and films to make money. My goal is to be a star on Broadway where the real actors are.” And that, in a convoluted way, was my attitude about writing for television—the “real” writers were writing novels—and I was only writing screenplays. At the time, however, I was working in South Africa a lot and those seventeen hour plane rides to Cape Town gave me ample time to fuss around with the idea of writing a novel, and what came out of that fussing was THE UGLY TEAPOT.

The story itself had an earlier germination. My brother had died of cancer at a very young age and his death had a devastating impact on me. At the time, I decided to funnel my grief into a screenplay (FIREFLIES), but I didn’t want to write a sad, depressing ode to my brother. He wouldn’t have liked that. So what did I write instead? I wrote an action/adventure film filled with magic and humor. When FIREFLIES metamorphosed into THE UGLY TEAPOT, I stayed true to my original story, but tried to make TEAPOT more “novel-like”. This required, for one thing, expanding my story. FIREFLIES was 110 pages long (normal for most screenplays, but too short for a middle-grade novel), so expanding it allowed me to flesh out my characters and situations. This was fun and intimidating at the same time, but I was helped along by the fact that I had kept most of my notes on character and plot from the original screenplay, and I had tons of material I’d been forced to cut from the screenplay in order to get it down to length.

Bottom line: I really enjoyed the process. So much so that I’m doing it again. I’m currently writing the sequel to THE UGLY TEAPOT. What’s it about? Well, I can’t tell you very much without a spoiler alert, but I can tell you this: Aladdin’s Lamp has appeared in a tiny village in the foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains, and the people living there will never be the same. Fathers will rise from the dead, dogs will start talking, and people will die. And that’s just on the first day.

If you would like to know more about THE UGLY TEAPOT: HANNAH’S STORY, here are some links, including one to my YouTube video promo. The sequel will be out at the end of this year, and I hope you’ll check them both out. Thanks for listening!


YouTube video promo:  http://bit.ly/1MWJAyK




Saturday, May 28

Guest Post: Movie Review - EQUALS


I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! 

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. 





******
Equals: A New Type of Sci-Fi?


Equals is the newest cinematic offering from A24 Films and DirecTV that focuses on a star-crossed romance within a utopian society. The world we are exposed to throughout Equals’ is intended to show how an ideal society can be created, as well as the logistical flaws involved in such an endeavor. Equals comes across as a film that does its best to develop a unique identity, separate from other recent dystopian youth films like The Hunger Games and Divergent.

Director Drake Doremus and writer Nathan Parker have created the utopian world of Equals, in which a near-futuristic society reminiscent of The Giver has chemically neutralized emotions in all its citizens. This is referred to as the “Switch On Syndrome” or SOS and anyone showing any form of emotion is shipped off to the Defective Emotional Neuropathy (DEN) center. Lead characters, Silas (Nicholas Hoult) and Nia (Kristen Stewart), meet each other at the DEN center after Silas first manifests SOS. Silas senses a common bond in Nia, who seems to suffer from emotion but is skilled at concealing it.

Casting Stewart in this role seems to fit with the common perception that she has trouble emoting. Her style of acting, coupled with a muted color palette to her wardrobe only helps to emphasize Nia's emotional strain. Although Nia knows that society wants to purge her of her emotions, she's unsure as to why. After Silas and Nia interact with a support group, Jacki Weaver's Bess, another SOS "victim," offers a chance at escaping. Bess states that she once had an encounter with a man who offered her a chance to go to "The Peninsula," a land of total freedom. She turned him down and believes that the man's life was ended.

One quirk of this futuristic world is that any the intrusive eye of big government seems to have cataracts as Nia and Silas rebel with little punishment or obstruction. This may cause some to wonder why such an oppressive system would have so few people leaving the community if it seems like such an optional way of living. For all of Equals' interesting world-building, it only feels like the audience gets the briefest overview of each set piece and element as if large chunks of notes were left within the script's margins. One shining element of this film is that even when Parker's' script fails to make logical sense, it seems to strike hard and effectively at the one thing the audience is told the film's society purges itself of: Emotion.

John Guleserian’s cinematographic focus on a muted, steel-gray color palette and close-up shots helps to bring the audience in touch with the emotional weight of Silas, Nia and their struggles. This is especially poignant during the pair's first attempt at intimacy where Nia finds herself struggling to communicate her thoughts and simply begs Silas to take everything from her as if such an intense emotional surge were best handled like a hot potato.

The film's final set piece may remind some of a Shakespearean drama, in a positive way. The story of Equals is divvied up among several small, emotive segments that ratchet up to an overwhelming finale. The taste that this finale leaves in each viewer's mouth may vary from person to person. In summation, Equals is a science-fiction film that presents a world that tries to survive without emotion. The combination of Drake Doremus and Nathan Parker, as director and scriptwriter respectively, and Kristen Stewart's acting prowess helps to drive home the importance of emotion in any society.


Tuesday, February 2

Guest Post: Soylent Green - Energy from a Forbidden Source


I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! 

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. 





******
Soylent Green - Energy from a Forbidden Source

Soylent Green is a film both highly integrated into pop culture and entirely opaque to many regarding its deeper implications, especially when it comes to energy crisis and environmentalism. While most people are aware that Soylent Green is made of people, they don't know why that's so horrifying nor in what context it came about. That being said, this film from the 1970s still remains relevant in its themes and motifs to this very day. In fact, it may be even more so.

The story of Soylent Green is a murder mystery set in New York of 2022. The population of the city has risen to an unsustainable 40 million people who live in cramped quarters and line up for water and Soylent Green - a high-protein food source supposedly made out of plankton. When a top level executive in the Soylent Corporation is murdered, Charlton Heston's Detective Thorn is called in to solve the case, a twisting caper that leads him to the famous and terrible conclusion that Soylent Green, the primary food source for the city, is not made of plankton but rather of people: dissidents and undesirables that are processed and fed to the rest of the population.

Part of what remains valuable about this story is that it works both as social commentary and pure science fiction. Harry Harrison's novel Make Room, Make Room! is expertly translated to the screen by director Richard Fleischer in potentially his greatest work. The stark direction that presents a New York that has been neglected more than anything else is complemented by powerful performances from Heston and Edward G. Robinson as Sol Roth - a man who still remembers the days before this dystopian nightmare became reality. Even Paula Kelly in a somewhat smaller role stands out for her believability and the sympathy we can assign to her.

But while this is a cinematic titan, it also speaks to problems that concerned people in the 70s and still should concern people today. According to NASA, global temperatures have continued to rise over the course of the last century with a direct correlation between the increase in temperature and an increase in carbon emissions from less than 1000 parts per million at the beginning of the 20th century to nearly 10,000 parts per million today. A big portion of those emissions is likely from agriculture, forestry, and other land use related to unsustainable practices that might one day make standard food production methods unfeasible or even impossible. While it is less likely that corporations would turn to cannibalism as a solution to this problem, rationing and the limiting of food varieties are both possibilities that humanity might have to contend with, especially considering our out-of-control population growth.

Soylent Green joins a number of eco-horror films in the cinematic canon. From Godzilla to The Day After Tomorrow, there are a number of movies that discuss how human activity leads to our inevitable downfall, but most present an outside force that comes to punish us for our indiscretions. Part of what makes Soylent Green stand out is that the villains are humans who have abandoned humanity. There are no aliens or monsters or weather patterns causing the central problem: the finger is pointed right at people who contributed to the squalor of New York and have chosen to feed the population to itself, literally, rather than find a humane solution.


It's somewhat disappointing to know that so many people know of Soylent Green but do not understand the deeper implications of the film. More than just a melodramatic declaration about the contents of Soylent Green, the film addresses serious environmental concerns that still threaten us all.

Saturday, December 26

Guest Post: Did The Force Awakens Meet Expectations?


Happy Recovery Day after Xmas!

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! 

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.





******
Did The Force Awakens Meet Expectations?




In a word - yes. As the Internet rushes to assure fans around the world that their favorite franchise is finally back without giving out spoilers, it's important to reflect on what makes this film actually work. While not flawless, The Force Awakens manages to tell a story that feels like it belongs in the Star Wars canon in a way that no visual property has managed to do since Return of the Jedi.

The Star Wars franchise is one of the largest in science fiction spanning comic miniseries spin offs, TV shows like Star Wars Rebels and Star Wars: Droid Tales available through Disney XD and DTV, novels, toys and countless other outlets that have created a rich universe easy to get lost in. Even with the elimination of the Expanded Universe as canon in the runup to The Force Awakens, there is still a ton of material to help flesh out this galaxy far, far away. Of course, what truly works about this movie is that it adds to that universe in a way that seems natural and fitting.

A major failure with the prequel trilogy was that it had far too large a focus. It wanted to tell the story of the fall of the Old Republic and rise of the Galactic Empire, but it did so in very broad strokes losing focus along the way. The Force Awakens hearkens back to the original trilogy in that it tells an epic story, without shifting perspective away from the main characters. Sure, the fate of every person living in this galaxy was important in the original trilogy, but the journey we were concerned about was Luke's. Similarly, the stakes in The Force Awakens are incredibly high, but ultimately our concern is with Finn and Rey who are caught up in this adventure.

One way in which this film truly excels is with its dialogue. All six of the previous films were almost Shakespearean at times in their writing, however that could often come off as stilted. Here every interaction feels natural, adding to the instant chemistry between several of the characters, and it really doesn't take long at all to start to love these new characters just as much as the returning ones.

The film itself focuses primarily on three main characters: Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac), Finn (John Boyega), and Rey (Daisy Ridley), with most of the screentime going to the latter two. After BB8, the R2D2-type droid of the new gang and trilogy, is given some important information by Dameron to prevent it from falling into the hands of the evil First Order, he closely escapes capture multiple times and meets up with Rey and Finn, starting them on an adventure that would soon change all of their lives.

Directing and cinematography really stand out in this film, not to mention successfully fulfilling JJ Abrams goal of returning to the less-CGI focused times of the original trilogy with a film full of practical and visually pleasing effects. The villains reflect the type of figures that we have gotten used to, but they also stand out with individual personalities and a sense of having inner lives that give them depth. And while Kylo Ren is arguably the most developed character in the film, the final scene before the credits is most notably beautiful and perfectly composed, leaving us with a sense of the grand scale of this event and the ones leading up to it.

While I don't want to go into detail or share any spoilers, it is valid to say that the structure of the film is very familiar, leading to a split reaction among fans regarding the plot and writing. Less discussed is the rather strange pacing at the beginning that moves in fits and doesn’t fully take off until Finn and Rey meet.

Other than the slow beginning though, the movie generally exceeds all expectations. Some fan theories were correct, others were way off thanks to very clever marketing, and there a quite a few surprises not many saw coming. If the pattern holds true, the next film will be far more narratively challenging, giving Rian Johnson (Director) some leeway by re-establishing the brand here.

Either way, Star Wars has regained the cache that it had spent decades building and nearly squandered with the much derided prequel trilogy. From here, we will hopefully see some daring new stories being told that will make us fall in love with this world all over again.


Tuesday, December 1

Guest Post: Eco-Horror Films - What Are The Consequences of Energy Consumption, Pollution, and Radiation?


Happy 1st of December!

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! 

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.





******
Eco-Horror Films: What Are The Consequences of Energy Consumption, Pollution, and Radiation?

There’s nothing more terrifying than a force we cannot physically fight or a threat that we have unleashed upon ourselves. Eco-horror movies tap into the very real fear of mankind destroying themselves when we abuse and destroy the environment for personal gain. About 82 percent of global warming emissions come from energy consumption, like cars and electricity, according to Alberta Energy. If we continue down this destructive path there’s no telling when exactly Mother Nature will decide to fight back with the fiery vengeance of these movies.

Godzilla (1954)

Godzilla stars Akira Takarada (Hideto Ogata) and Momoko Kochi (Emiko Yamane) along with a few other actors who have played a part in the franchise since its birth. It tells the story of a massive dinosaur-like creature who has awoken due to excessive hydrogen bomb testing. Godzilla goes on a rampage upon her awakening and it’s up to Emiko and Hideto to figure out a way to stop her, but how do you stop a beast that has become immune to radiation and explosives?

C.H.U.D. (1984)

Police Captain Bosch (Christopher Curry) must team up with Shepard (Daniel Stern), a local volunteer who works with the homeless, and Cooper (John Heard) to uncover the truth about what’s really going on in the sewers and how to stop it. The NRC has been secretly transporting toxic waste beneath Manhattan, in the sewers, even though they were strictly advised not to. Unfortunately, as a result of storing the toxic waste, the homeless population who live in the sewers began to mutate into cannibalistic humanoids pulling people down into the sewers to devour them.

The Bay (2012)

Donna Thompson, a young news reporter (played by Kether Donohue), recalls the tragic events that broke out in a small town in Maryland. The Chesapeake Bay has been receiving factory runoff for years - a problem no one really took too seriously until the day of an annual seafood festival when parasites from the runoff infects the town’s water supply. During the festival, panic and confusion ensues as people are being devoured by mutated fish and become violently sick and deformed by the water itself. This film is sure to make you think twice about indulging in seafood.

Children of Men (2006)

In Children of Men, constant pollution has caused a flu pandemic that killed many and destroyed humanity’s ability to reproduce. Clive Owen plays Theo, a man who must escort the only pregnant woman in the world, Kee (Clare-Hope Ashitey) to the safety of a scientific group determined to solve man’s self-inflicted infertility. Along the way they must evade many who wish to stop them with any means necessary, even if it means mankind becomes extinct as a result.

The Day after Tomorrow (2004)

This movie is the worst case scenario for the effects of global warming and the best depiction of just how Mother Nature’s wrath can annihilate humanity. Dennis Quaid plays a climatologist intent on warning the president of the impending intense shift in climate change. His son, played by Jake Gyllenhaal, is trapped with his friends in New York when flood waters rise and super storms begin to pound the continent forcing the world into the next ice age.

Conclusion

Perhaps some of these situations seem implausible but they’re still worth contemplating. If we aren’t quick to change our ways or work on better sources of fuel, some fear we may be destined for these types of devastating outcomes. Though who’s to say, maybe we need a Godzilla or an ice age to initiate a new renaissance and make us appreciate the beautiful destructive resilience of our planet Earth.

Saturday, October 31

Guest Post: How Home Invasion Films Could Change with Today's Technology

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! And also HAPPY HALLOWEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.





******
How Home Invasion Films Could Change with Today’s Technology

Films that were made in the past were great in their own time, but that’s all these films have come to be - things of the past. Can you imagine how different these classics from the 90s and beyond would be in today’s world? In the day and age of WiFi and a plethora of advanced technology at our fingertips, several of these overused movie tropes from the past would not make any sense. Many can’t go a full twenty-four hours without their cell phone, and the fact that villains would have to devise plans to combat all such technology in order to fulfill their evil deeds, leaves us with a number of plots that just wouldn’t fly in today’s tech-savvy world.

Scream

Take Scream, for example. Released in the mid 90s, this slasher classic was the first of its kind featuring characters who were aware of real world horror films. The entire premise of the film revolves around victims receiving mysterious threats from an unknown caller who then appears in a ghost mask and kills whoever was on the line. Of course, caller ID wasn't really a thing back then and many teens get brutally murdered over the course of the film.

It’s clear this movie would need significant rewrites in order for it to work in today's world. First of all, the killer uses a phone to torment his victims before he kills them. We now have caller ID built into just about every telecommunications device, and thanks to advanced GPS tracking capabilities, the killer's location would have been discovered almost immediately. Unfortunately, we’ve advanced to the point where there are now caller ID spoofing apps, and technology to outsmart these apps; but either way this technology would render the original Ghostface villains tactics obsolete.

Home Alone

Home Alone, another 90s classic, would also be completely different today. Following a power outage and all the alarms being turned off, the McCallister family scrambles to get to the airport in time for their flight to Paris and the parents don’t realize until it’s too late that they have left their 8 year old son Kevin behind. Of course, there’s no way to check up on him and all the direct flights back home are booked. Needless to say, this movie would’ve never happened today.

The McCallister family is generally well off and have a pretty nice house. It’s probably safe to assume all of their kids would have an iPhone, and with today’s WiFi capabilities it wouldn’t have been overly difficult to reach Kevin on the phone, through text message, or some app. Still, the McCallister's were loaded, and they wouldn’t have left their mansion unprotected meaning it would have been armed with the best home security system that money can buy which would’ve allowed Kevin’s parents to check up on him via online video and alerted the authorities to any intrusions. The two criminals who tormented young Kevin in more than one film would have been arrested immediately.

The Ring

The Ring, the first American remake of a Japanese horror classic, features viewers of a videotape inexplicably dying seven days after watching it. The plotline is a bit strange with the tape being haunted by an evil entity known as Samara who literally crawls out of the television and scares the person to death. A horrifying film at the time of its release, the movie still holds up to this day and many regard it as a classic. But VHS tapes are long gone, and now even DVD’s are on their way out with all these new streaming services constantly popping up. However, could she perform such a feat on a DVD or Blu-ray disc? It’s possible, The Ring could still work because Samara is technically a spirit, so even our current technology might not be able to stop her.





Funny Games

Funny Games was a sick and mentally disturbing game of a foreign film that was released in 1997, with an American remake in 2007. The film features a family of three that goes on a vacation to the countryside where two evil young men take the family hostage and force them to perform a number of sadistic “games”. While malfunctioning phones are shown in the film, many people have security systems in their vacation homes these days and even if the victims had knowingly allowed their visitors into the house, they still could have used the system to alert authorities. It’s also safe to say there would be more than one cell phone and surely some sort of tablet or computer lying around. Funny Games would have had a much different ending with our new device consumed lifestyles.







Conclusion

Movies are like a time capsule. The technology that's available at the time of a film's production cannot be changed. If you stop and think about it, today's movies wouldn't work ten years from now either. That's why it's important for us to appreciate the classic films for what they are. Writers today have to think about technology when writing a film set in modern times. Home invasion films are much harder to pull off in today's technologically sound world, of course we just have to be ahead of the times as so perfectly demonstrated in The Purge. While the technology references may become outdated and new systems more difficult to overrun, the home invasion trope will continue to entertain as long as it’s a possibility lurking right outside your door.

Tuesday, October 6

Guest Post: Vampires in Pop Culture and What it Means About Society

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's!

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.





******
Vampires in Pop Culture and What it Means About Society

No creature of the night has been met with as much media attention and controversy in the past century than the vampire. There is no "right" way to portray a vampire, though many fans of this blood-sucking mythological creature would argue that vampires need to be scary, not sexy, while others insist that one of the main things that make vampires irresistible is their natural, mysterious sensuality. Either way, vampires have evolved in many ways over the past 100 years - from frightening to sexy, from silly to misunderstood - and continue to delight horror audiences. Currently, vampires have found a creepy, comfortable home within FX's The Strain, based on Guillermo del Toro and Chuck Hogan's novels of the same name, which brings these monsters back to their frightening roots.

Vampires have been popular film subjects ever since the early 1900's. Some of the earliest horror films, including Dracula and Nosferatu, portrayed the main villain as the vampire (and both were based on Bram Stoker's novel). While the vampire in Nosferatu is ghastly, with elf-like ears and long claws, the titular vampire in Dracula is austere and debonair, greeting his guests with regality. They're both based on the same subject, but their appearances and personalities couldn't be more different. It all depends on how the filmmakers want others to see the vampires. Should victims be lured into his lair through charm or coerced with fear?

By the end of the millennium, vampires suddenly started being sexy instead of scary. In 1987, the teen scream Lost Boys transformed vampires into hunky oddballs with earrings and cool hair, and 1994's Interview With a Vampire portrayed vampires as romantic and tortured. The late 1990's TV series Buffy the Vampire Slayer brought some of the creepiness back into vampires, making vampires out to be hideous monsters. And few vampires have been scarier than the black-eyed demons in the 2007 horror film 30 Days of Night.

But nothing could prepare the world for the rise of the brooding, gentle vampire heartthrob, embodied by Twilight's Edward Cullen and The Vampire Diaries' Salvatore brothers. While horror fans scoffed at this change, teenage girls flocked to fill theater seats and tune in on weekday nights to swoon over these bloodsucking bad boys. They represent the ultimate romantic dream - a man who has had all the time in the world to learn about love and is ready to practice it with a beautiful, mortal woman.

Despite this eroticism of the vampire, the most current take on vampirism is best embodied in the TV series The Strain, which will end its second season on October 4th. Rather than having vampires as an unthreatening romantic presence (in fact, they don’t even have any genitalia), this show views them as the downfall of the human race and society as we know it. The Strain's vampire "virus" is transmitted through parasitic worms, bringing an eerie realism to vampirism that mirrors real-world concerns of illness and epidemic, such as in third world countries. However, this is not all that the story is commenting on.

Although we haven’t seen it in the series yet, the third book in the trilogy, The Night Eternal, tells of a post apocalyptic New York in which the sky is constantly dark and the rain is a black liquid. Many people argue that climate change and global warming could bring forth these scenarios - unless we humans do more to avoid the worst. We will have to be more aware of our consumption of fossil fuels, and gas companies and energy providers will have to make sure their resources are more sustainable. Of course, we will have to make use of some common sense practices such as recycling but in many cases, we seem too ignorant to pay attention. In the end, that's what makes vampires scary - not the fangs or aversion to sunlight. It’s the way they reflect humanity as a whole and how we ourselves are capable of destroying the whole world like an infectious disease or a natural disaster without even putting in much effort.

Even though their popularity comes and goes, vampires will always be a staple figure in horror, science fiction, and fantasy media. Where they'll appear next (and how) remains a mystery and is up to our current fears at the time.


As for me, I tend to stick more on the side of “scary” vampires like modern portrayals in 30 Days of Night, The Strain and even Nosferatu. To be honest, I have never even seen any of the Twilight films or romantic vampire television shows like Vampire Diaries or True Blood. Now, this may be due to my bias towards the horror genre but “sexy” and “sensitive” hundred year old creatures just never appealed to me. Nonetheless, it’s interesting to watch the constant evolution of this creature throughout time. Whether it be a threat to the human race or a love interest for our protagonists, vampires are most likely here to stay and constantly transform to suit our world views.

**Note from Carole**
You all know me and I had to throw my two cents in with a subject like this. Vampires are an interesting milestone in the world of fiction. Vampires have been around since the dawn of religion. People have always had a fear of death - including the undead. I do love my scary vampires, but I am a sucker for a good story with vampires being a love interest. If I had to pick between the two...I'd be so unsure of who to keep and who to rid of. In the end, I'd probably pick the scary vampires as well.

Friday, September 11

Guest Post: What the Dystopian Genre Needs to Address by Maria Ramos

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's!

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.





******
What the Dystopian Genre Needs to Address

The recent rise in popularity among young adult novels and films that started with the Harry Potter franchise has erupted into a massive market aimed at teenagers. Lately, authors have been preoccupied with placing their young protagonists into dystopian futures, where the government is corrupt and survival is often a brutal, arduous struggle. In the case of the upcoming film The Scorch Trials, the second in James Dashner's Maze Runner saga, a group of teenagers is imprisoned in a desolate and isolated landscape as part of a scientific experiment. So why is it that these stories resonate so much with their target audience?



Stories such as The Hunger Games and Divergent (which are both currently on demand if you have cable) place their characters in a society where the ruling class is unquestionably evil, and the heroes find themselves in a position to subvert the powerful and overthrow a fascist regime for the good of the common people. Adolescents generally view authority in a negative light, and they can identify with the desire to rebel and have an impact on the way their world is shaped. Some of the more perceptive teens who read these novels may recognize parallels to their own world, whether it is in the huge income disparity in modern America, or the way the rich manipulate the media to serve their own ends. And a larger portion of the audience is likely drawn to the budding romances that always seem to be a subplot in these novels.


While these stories do a good job of communicating ideas that most teens recognize and respond to, they neglect to examine issues that would likely be present in an actual dystopian society. Racism, which has been and continues to be a source of conflict in societies everywhere, somehow disappears in these fictional cultures. The casts of the Divergent and The Maze Runner films are completely white except for one select African American character in both. While The Hunger Games does feature some black characters, there is no mention of or allusion to any sort of bigotry or discrimination, or even the slightest hint of cultural differences - except unfortunately, by real-world fans.

Likewise, sexism, another important issue around the world, is completely absent from these stories. The tough-as-nails exteriors of heroines like Katniss Everdeen and Tris Prior almost seem to preemptively nullify any sexist behavior that might be directed at them, but in worlds filled with vile, unscrupulous people, it's laughable to think that they (or any females around them) wouldn't be looked down on or taken advantage of at some point in their journey. The irony of The Hunger Games' supposed feminist bent is that Katniss actually wins by not playing, avoiding conflict whenever possible, and only killing in self defense.

If dystopian fiction is going to continue to thrive, authors need to expand their worldview beyond politics and hand-to-hand combat. Today's teens are much more thoughtful and perceptive than we often give them credit for, and they deserve stories with more thematic depth and parallels to real world problems. Including these more serious issues would open up awareness and spark discussion that could go a long way towards creating actual change. Most of all, it would introduce shades of gray into what is quickly becoming a repetitive, cookie cutter, black and white struggle of good vs. evil.


Saturday, August 8

Guest Post: Why Dark Places Doesn't Live Up to Its Predecessor, Gone Girl

I would all like you to give another warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's!

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.




******
Why Dark Places Doesn't Live Up to Its Predecessor, Gone Girl

Gillian Flynn, the award-winning author of Gone Girl, is no stranger to exploring the dark psychological elements of human nature. The novel’s film adaptation, directed by David Fincher, was released in theaters in 2014 and was an overnight success. Grossing over $368 million worldwide, the movie was nominated for several awards, and garnered mostly positive reviews from critics and fans alike. The widespread success of Gone Girl has established Flynn as a shining star in the psychological thriller genre, so it was really just a matter of time before another adaptation of one of her books was in the works.

Following the success of Gone Girl, high expectations were set for the upcoming film Dark Places, an adaptation of Flynn's 2009 novel of the same name. Dark Places tells the story of Libby Day (Charlize Theron), the sole survivor of the gruesome murder of her family 25 years prior. As a child Libby testified against her brother, Ben (Corey Stoll), while under pressure from lawyers and the media resulting in him being convicted for the murders. Present-day Libby is in desperate need of cash, and agrees to speak to members of “The Kill Club," an organization dedicated to solving cold cases, after meeting Lyle Wirth (Nicholas Hoult). The Kill Club believes Ben is innocent and was wrongly imprisoned, leading Libby to question what she has believed to be the truth all these years and begin her own investigation into the events that occurred that night. As Libby interviews people from both her and her brother's past, she realizes the truth is more twisted than anyone ever thought.

Directed and written by Gilles Paquet-Brenner, Dark Places has received mixed to negative reviews from critics so far. While Gone Girl was wildly successful, it is clear that Dark Places just doesn't live up to its predecessor on the big screen. The most significant difference between the novel and the film is the lack of Libby's internal monologue in the film. One of the novel's biggest strengths is Libby's wry and cynical commentary, which is largely absent from the film except for the beginning and end. Other than this omission, the film is mostly faithful to the novel. While Gillian Flynn did not have the level of involvement in Dark Places as she did in Gone Girl, she says that she thinks fans will approve of the adaptation and that she especially liked the decision to cast Theron as Libby Day. While it’s obvious Theron does not resemble the redheaded novel-Libby, she is still an excellent portrayal of the female protagonist due to her stellar acting skills and ability to bring Day to life. With a cast also including Christina Hendricks and Chloë Grace Moretz, Dark Places has no shortage of talented actors.


Premiering in theaters August 7th, the film has been available through DirecTV VOD since June, giving many fans an exclusive look. Even so, and despite its fidelity, many critics and fans are still disappointed in the film for several reasons. Besides the perceived lack of Libby's perspective, some feel that the film simply has too much going on and that the content of the novel was too much to cram into a two-hour film. Others are disappointed because they think that the film does not achieve the novel's uniquely Midwestern atmosphere of poverty and depression, especially since it was mostly filmed in Louisiana. However, cinematographer Barry Ackroyd (The Hurt Locker, Captain Phillips) does boost the quality of the film quite a bit by imbuing it with an appropriately glum color palette and dreamy photography. While Dark Places is similar to Gone Girl in regard to its dark subject matter, it fails to deliver the entrancing story level and thrill Gone Girl so successfully captivated audiences with.

Tuesday, March 24

Guest Post:The Best Robot Science Fiction

I would all like you to give a warm welcome to my guest here at CRR's! She is going to be giving us a 3 part series about Science Fiction! She is an awesome writer and she has some great insight! 

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaRamos1889.

Here is part 1 of Maria's posts about Science Fiction. :) 

******


So many of the science-fiction trends that are popular today can be traced back as early as the fifties. Recent films that use science-fiction as a vehicle for social commentary (such as District or even Pacific Rim) owe a tremendous amount to cold war era science fiction writers.

Writers from the past mused about an age when robots would surround us. We’ve arrived at the dawn of that age — today, artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses everything from the satellite-based GPS mode in cell phones that help people navigate, to the automated home security systems sold by ADT in Durham, to the surgical robots presently in use at hospitals in Houston.

For every useful application of modern AI, however, we must remain alert. Whether AI and its development into more and more complex forms will ultimately help or hinder the human race going forward is often a point of debate and contention, and it’s also a theme which links the following novels that, although written over the span of the past 70 years or so, are often considered among the best in robot science fiction.

  1. I, Robot (1950) by Isaac Asimov This "novel" is actually a series of short stories which revolutionized robot fiction by providing us with "The Three Laws" of robotics the short story Runabout. Asimov’s “laws” establish a basis for exploring the relationship between humans and robots throughout not only Asimov’s work, but science-fiction in general. Not only did Asimov continue to explore the psychological and sociological implications of human dependence on artificial intelligence in the form of robots, but he set the foundation for other authors to do the same. 
  2. Cyborg (1972) by Martin Caiden — This one formed the basis for the 1970's television The Six Million Dollar Man, starring Lee Majors as Steve Austin, the novel's main character, a former astronaut turned “bionic man” who was injured in a test flight that should have killed him. However, while the television series focused mainly on his life after receiving all the cybernetic implants (both legs, one arm, and one eye), the novel explores the issues of the man dealing first with the devastating injuries and then with the existential crisis of living as a man/machine hybrid. There is also a reboot currently in production that will star Mark Wahlberg.

  3. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968) by Philip K. Dick — As relevant today as when it was originally published, this novel explores the meaning of humanity by contrasting humans and robots of higher intelligence. It does so through the story of a bounty hunter sent to deactivate and destroy a set of androids that have escaped their owners and are now on the loose in a futuristic and dystopian earth. The novel was the original source material for the Ridley Scott movie Blade Runner.
  4. The Soul of the Robot (1974) by Barrington J. Bayley — This is a simpler tale that nonetheless sticks to the theme of exploring what it means to a machine to be human. It is the tale of the only robot with consciousness, or a soul, if you will, and his struggles with what to do with it and how to prove that, although machine, he is at least the equal to the flesh and blood humans all around him. It’s quite similar to a story that Asimov published two years later, The Bicentennial Man, which was made into a film in the nineties starring Robin Williams.
  5. Neuromancer (1984) by William Gibson — Hardcore cerebral sci-fi, this gem comes from the author who first coined the phrase "cyberspace," a concept used liberally in this novel. The basic plot follows a has-been computer hacker/drug addict who is recruited for his nefarious skills by a less-than-reputable party. From there, the characters physically travel in and out of cyberspace and the matrix, and the reader is taken in and out of the consciousness of several characters, a consciousness that is found to also be eminently transferable to said cyberspace and mingled with superior artificial intelligence, blurring the lines between humanity and AI.


Regardless of whether you follow the debate over artificial intelligence and whether it will be the salvation or doom of mankind eventually, the above novels each provide entertainment mixed with food for thought, making them as relevant today as the day they were first published.